BETA

This draft website and its contents were developed by ICF International; TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind (see disclaimer).

Transportation for Communities - Advancing Projects Through Partnerships


Applications - Visioning and Transportation

Visioning is a planning and policy exercise that engages community stakeholders in creating a consensus about the future of their community. Visions describe the desired future (or futures) of communities and outline clear strategies for reaching the desired future(s), based on present conditions and anticipated future trends. Approaches to visioning often blend traditional strategic and scenario planning with best practices from technical, visual, and interactive community-engagement techniques to maximize public participation. Visions commonly produce a general statement of future direction, a set of goals and objectives, and implementation strategies. Example outcomes may include: high-level decision-making principles, general long-term goals and objectives, conceptual future development maps, or sample streetscape designs.

T-Viz Diagram

Visioning can support practitioners in all phases of transportation decision-making. Transportation - Visioning for Communities (T-VIZ) is a visioning activity framework that provides guidance for transportation practitioner participation in broad-based community visioning. This participation will help ensure visioning products that are generated will be useful as inputs into specific transportation planning and project processes. T-VIZ identifies the visioning elements that are applicable to transportation, and TCAPP links these elements to specific key decisions during long range planning, programming, corridor planning and NEPA/permitting. The integration of T-VIZ and TCAPP illustrates where and how visions can support or facilitate transportation decisions.

To get a snapshot of each Key Decision, roll over the Decision Guide graphic below. Click on any individual Key Decision to access detailed information including: purpose and anticipated outcomes; partner roles; integration with external planning processes; linkages across phases; questions to assist decision makers; and data, tools, technologies that support the decision.

Key Decisions that are grayed-out have no specific relevance to the individual application or topic area but are still accessible from this graphic.

Dg-darkgrey-titlebar-corner-left LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

LRP-1

Determine if scope, goals, measures and/or commitments from visioning are available and applicable.

LRP-1 Approve Scope of LRTP Process
LRP-2

Consider goals and adopted future from visioning to inform the transportation vision and goals.

LRP-2 Approve Vision and Goals
LRP-3

Goals and objectives from a vision process can inform the selection of evaluation criteria and performance measures to ensure that the preferred scenario reflects the community vision.

LRP-3 Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods and Measures
LRP-4

The approved list of specific corridors, roads and areas which are deficient identified at this key decision serves as a basis for problems and opportunities addressed in both the corridor planning and environmental review processes.

LRP-4 Approve Transportation Deficiencies
LRP-5

Consider partner commitments in the community visioning process to identify potential revenue sources.

LRP-5 Approve Financial Assumptions
LRP-6

Strategies are developed to address the deficiencies identified in LRP-4. A strategy is a specific tactic or policy employed or recommended by an organization.

LRP-6 Approve Strategies
LRP-7

Scenarios are based on approved strategies and are compared using the evaluation criteria, methodology and performance measures.

LRP-7 Approve Plan Scenarios
LRP-8

Validate that the preferred scenario is supportive of the adopted future(s)

LRP-8 Adopt Preferred Plan Scenario
LRP-9

Air Quality conformity analysis is done within the air quality process in order to validate that the preferred scenario meets current conformity requirements.

LRP-9 Adopt Finding of Conformity by MPO
LRP-10

At this key decision a final plan is adopted by the MPO board.

LRP-10 Adopt LRTP by MPO
LRP-11

This is a legally required decision consisting of the federal approval of conformity of the LRTP.

LRP-11 Approve Conformity Analysis

Dg-darkgrey-titlebar-corner-left PROGRAMMING

PRO-1

Consider partner commitments from visioning to identify potential revenue sources.

PRO-1 Approve Revenue Sources
PRO-2

This key decision establishes a consistent methodology for estimating project costs for both the long range transportation plan and the TIP.

PRO-2 Approve Methodology for Identifying Project Costs and Criteria for Allocating Revenue
PRO-3

This key decision establishes the list of projects drawn from the long range plan or corridor planning process that will be considered for funding in the TIP.

PRO-3 Approve Project List Drawn from Adopted Plan Scenario or Solution Set
PRO-4

Vision implementation priorities can provide data to inform project prioritization criteria.

PRO-4 Approve Project Prioritization
PRO-5

At this key decision project priorities are compared to available funding within program restrictions to select those projects to be included in the TIP.

PRO-5 Reach Consensus on Draft TIP
PRO-6

At this key decision, the MPO adopts the TIP. Before the MPO can do this, comments on the draft TIP must be addressed and a final TIP must be produced.

PRO-6 Adopt TIP by MPO
PRO-7

The Governor or designee should ensure that the TIP meets other state and federal requirements so that the TIP can be incorporated into the STIP and be in agreement with the state document.

PRO-7 Approve TIP by Governor and Incorporate into Draft STIP
PRO-8

At this key decision the draft STIP is developed to release for public comment.

PRO-8 Reach Consensus on Draft STIP
PRO-9

In order to meet federal requirements, the STIP must meet conformity and fiscal constraint, where required.

PRO-9 Approve STIP with respect to Conformity and Fiscal Constraint

Dg-darkgrey-titlebar-corner-left CORRIDOR PLANNING

COR-1

Determine if scope, goals, measures and/or commitments from visioning are available and applicable.

COR-1 Approve Scope of Corridor Planning Process
COR-2

Consider the problem statement and desired outcomes from visioning.

COR-2 Approve Problem Statements and Opportunities
COR-3

Consider applicable goals and adopted future from visioning.

COR-3 Approve Goals for the Corridor
COR-4

Review plans, key issues, and visions applicable to social, cultural, natural, and environmental review.

COR-4 Reach Consensus on Scope of Environmental Review and Analysis
COR-5

Information from scope, approved goals, adopted future, and measures to inform development of criteria or performance measures.

COR-5 Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods and Measures
COR-6

A range of approved solution sets for the corridor results from this key decision.

COR-6 Approve Range of Solution Sets
COR-7

Validate that the preferred solution set is supportive of the consensus vision and/or adopted future(s).

COR-7 Adopt Preferred Solution Set
COR-8

At this key decision priorities for implementation of the individual solutions are established.

COR-8 Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods and Measures for Prioritization of Projects
COR-9

Validate project prioritization is consistent with and/or supportive of the adopted future(s).

COR-9 Adopt Priorities for Implementation

Dg-darkgrey-titlebar-corner-left ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/NEPA MERGED WITH PERMITTING

ENV-1

Determine if indicators and consensus future(s) impact the scope of the project.

ENV-1 Reach Consensus on Scope of Environmental Review
ENV-2

This key decision is required to satisfy the legal requirement of publishing a Notice of Intent (NOI) to inform partners and the public of the commencement of the environmental review phase.

ENV-2 Approve Notice of Intent
ENV-3

Determine how the vision problem statement, key issues, consensus future(s), goals and guiding principles impact the project purpose and need.

ENV-3 Approve Purpose and Need/Reach Consensus on Project Purpose
ENV-4

Consensus on an initial geographic area of study (the area within which any alternatives will fall) is reached. The study area is closely linked to the purpose and need and is informed by transportation and other planning processes.

ENV-4 Reach Consensus on Study Area
ENV-5

Consider indicators, implementation priorities, and action steps from visioning.

ENV-5 Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods and Measures
ENV-6

A full range of possible project alternatives to meet the purpose and need is identified. Information about both selected and eliminated scenarios and solution sets from long range transportation planning and corridor planning inform the range of alternatives approved at this step.

ENV-6 Approve Full Range of Alternatives
ENV-7

This shared step between the NEPA and permitting processes involves the approval of the alternatives that are suggested to be carried forward. There is essential information created in long range planning and corridor planning that informs this decision.

ENV-7 Approve Alternatives to be Carried Forward
ENV-8

This is a formal approval point at which the Draft EIS with conceptual mitigation is approved and circulated for public review. Land use partners indicate their support of any land use policy changes that would be required to implement the recommendations in the Draft EIS.

ENV-8 Approve Draft EIS with Conceptual Mitigation
ENV-9

This key decision is required to satisfy the regulatory requirement for Section 404 permitting that the public receive notice of a permit application.

ENV-9 Approve Resource Agency Public Notice
ENV-10

Validate the preferred alternative is consistent with the adopted future(s).

ENV-10 Approve Preferred Alternative/
LEDPA
ENV-11

This decision is a required procedural step in the Section 404 permitting process. At this step, a final determination of jurisdictional waters of the United States in the project area is made.

ENV-11 Approve Final Jurisdictional Determination
ENV-12

Following selection of the preferred alternative/LEDPA, partners reach consensus on additional avoidance and minimization measures not included in the preliminary design.

ENV-12 Reach Consensus on Avoidance and Minimization for the LEDPA
ENV-13

A final EIS is approved that meets all legal requirements and addresses comments received on the Draft EIS.

ENV-13 Approve Final EIS
ENV-14

At this step in the environmental review phase, the Record of Decision is issued.

ENV-14 Approve the Record of Decision
ENV-15

At this final step in the environmental review phase, the final permit decision is rendered.

ENV-15 Render Permit Decision and Approve Avoidance and Minimization
 

A vision creates significant benefits with the potential to improve both the quality and timeliness of decision-making.

  • A vision provides a framework for the physical, economic and social context of the future community. This can help transportation decision makers avoid delays in plans and projects that are caused by fundamentally different points of view on the community's future. Visions provide a mechanism to align transportation decisions with the quality of life outcomes that the community has defined for its future.
  • A vision can articulate consensus from the community on its future. To achieve consensus, the visioning process must be broad-based and inclusive of all of the diverse interests within a community. It is built on proactive and interactive collaboration of formal decision makers with any and all interested groups or individuals.

The result of this collaboration is both consensus on the vision and a commitment to implement the vision by using it as the foundation for all community plans, projects and priorities. This alignment creates an opportunity to implement integrated planning, including land use, transportation, conservation, and economic development plans that are not only consistent but mutually supportive. Transportation decisions improve when planning and project development builds upon the relationships and partnerships that are established during visioning.

The products of visioning serve as a foundation to guide the scope and broad direction of future transportation plans. In addition, visioning can also be used as a means to facilitate public involvement in the development of a specific project or plan. TCAPP supports both by showing how the outcomes of the visioning process described in T-VIZ are integrated in all four phases of transportation decision making, from planning through project development. Community visioning can occur at any point in time, but the long range transportation plan process often provides a logical point at which to incorporate the community vision. However, visioning can also guide project prioritization in Programming, provide input for the detailed study of solution sets in Corridor Planning, and be used as a checkpoint in Environmental Review to make sure the preferred alternative is consistent with the community's vision.

Visioning for Communities (T-VIZ) and Transportation for Communities (TCAPP) Relationship
Both T-VIZ and TCAPP are based on a philosophy of collaboration that includes:

  • Interdisciplinary participation by a broad range of formal community, environmental and transportation representatives
  • Proactive outreach and interactive involvement of diverse range of stakeholders;
  • Commitment to using the context and quality of life values defined by the community as the foundation for decision making;
  • Emphasis on creating and vetting a range of scenarios or solutions;
  • Expanding decision maker and stakeholder ownership in the decision making process and responsibility for implementation.

Both T-VIZ and TCAPP are based on robust collaborative practices. T-VIZ includes four Visioning Components which act as focus areas for different visioning activities. Each of these components is relevant to transportation decision making as well.

Forming Partnerships
Successful visioning requires involvement, collaboration, and partnership by public, private, and civic organizations, including the formal transportation decision making partners. Partner organizations are a major factor in any effort to reach consensus that can be carried forward into implementation. During transportation decision making these same partnerships may be leveraged to ensure the adopted vision is reflected in the adopted transportation plan, project prioritization, corridor or sub-area studies, and environmental review. A lack of collaboration can slow momentum on getting a project implemented and weaken links between the principles that are developed in the visioning process and application of these principles to the plans and policies of partners. This application shows where to consider those partnerships and how those partnerships may be important in TCAPP.

Reaching Stakeholders
A successful visioning process will enhance public understanding and ownership in transportation decisions. Improving communications with stakeholders can produce public trust in the transportation process and give stakeholders the ability to provide appropriate feedback. Visioning also increases stakeholder ownership and commitment to the community consensus for the future. When communities have created a vision, it is essential that transportation decision making use it as the foundation for transportation plans and projects. An important aspect of TCAPP is collaboration with stakeholders and incorporating their input into transportation decision making. TCAPP can be used to build upon the outreach conducted and input gathered in T-VIZ, to produce a more robust transportation process that is linked and builds on the stakeholder outreach conducted during visioning.

Considering Communities
Visioning gives communities the opportunity to express their desires for the future, including transportation components. Visioning offers a community the chance to better understand how transportation systems can shape the community's future and how specific transportation goals or strategies can help achieve the preferred future. A transportation project that emerges from a consensus vision may be more likely to create lasting value for a community by helping move toward long-term environmental, economic, or social goals. When local governments are involved in regional visioning processes, the projects they choose to sponsor are often more reflective and cognizant of community values and concerns, and more consistent with established goals; these projects are also more likely to be selected or prioritized for funding within an MPO or DOT transportation plan.

Tracking Commitments
Implementation of a visioning process is as important as the development of the vision. Successful visioning processes create specific actions or "next steps" needed to implement the vision. Transportation agencies are an essential partner in supporting implementation. The linkage between T-VIZ and TCAPP will help practitioners understand how transportation plans, programs and projects need to support the implementation of the community vision.


We invite your comments/concerns about this website and its contents. Please send us an email at transportationforcommunities@gmail.com.